WHAT IN THE WORLD IS UNIVERSE? : A PRIME EXAMPLE

106 ISSN 2518-1866 (Online), ISSN 2307-3705 (Print). Philosophy & Cosmology 2016 (Vol. 17)

Marvin E. Kirsh1 — PhD Biochemistry,

The City University of New York

(Los Angeles, USA)

E-mail: kirsh2152000@yahoo.com

This writing attempts to capture mind and matter to rational description by focusing on

disparity between scientific method as it extracts concepts and discards particulars and ordinary

cognitive functioning that extends from proximal experience. Discourse underlined with the

concept of strict uniqueness of world entities is intended to examine critically paradox and

solution efforts in the mathematical and cosmological sciences as problems of zero, infinity: vast

and small numbers and discreteness are addressed.

Keywords: mind / matter, motion, prime numbers, cognition, visual representation, infinity,

rationality, uniqueness, shape / form, world / universe, universals

Introduction

From Radar

No one exactly knows

Exactly how clouds look in the sky

Or the shape of the mountains below them

Or the direction in which fish swim.

No one exactly knows.

The eye is jealous of whatever moves

And the heart Is too far buried in the sand

To tell.

Jack Spicer12

The human mind brings the witnessible world to life in two versions; one

seemingly atemporally composed strictly of what is reflected back to the eye from

encounter, the other entailing a search for truth that survives the test of time. Hegels’

(Hegel, 2003) “phenomena” entails a motion picture of events possessed to the mind

that is descriptive in nature, a world of phenomena not necessarily bearing universal

character but that the world of the human is contained to phenomena, the witness

of phenomena, though not necessarily to laws of nature that are universal. Cognition

then questions to ask whether what if anything might exist beyond the reflection that

is supposedly confined to the self and thus blind to all else that might supposedly

exist. In the search for truth Aristotle, the student of Socrates, is described to have

taken issue with him, describing the world as other than possessing absolute truth as

the basis from which men might “act accordingly”, Aristotle advances the existence

© Kirsh Marvin, 2016

1 https://www.poetrysociety.org/psa/poetry/poetry_in_motion/atlas/losangeles/from_

radar/

Marvin E. Kirsh What in the World is Universe? : A Prime Example

ISSN 2518-1866 (Online), ISSN 2307-3705 (Print). Philosophy & Cosmology 2016 (Vol. 17) 107

of an unmoved mover, a world of glassine spheres elaborated with numbers, a

world of men with variable disposition, and pursued the scientific study of nature.

Interpretation in todays’ world is dominated by statistical analysis and seems to have

descended mostly from Aristotle rather than Socrates. It is plausible though that

Aristotle, having perceived Socrates’ difficult argument and failure with Gorgias over

rhetoric and the genuine knack for truth, had not taken a different philosophical

route, but pursued to find a truth from nature that he judged essential to Socrates

success. Aspects of modern rationalizations in attempts to understand nature will be

presented and a different interpretation given involving forms and prime numbers.

Socrates contest with Gorgias is resolved if, as in the egg shape presented, a

transcendental form underlining mind and matter owes its evolution to the shortest

route possible without added rhetoric, i.e. a straight line and the longest lifetime, i.e.

longest pathlength of connections to the evolved surface, the most direct assertion

bearing the greatest depth of content.

Discussion

If it is asserted that Einsteins’ theory of relativity seduces reason to test it because

it challenges to threaten the existence of identity it still remains to argument

whether, other than the self that mirrors upon it from witness to the external

whether it is plausible that reasoning might produce other (Levinas, 1969, Husserl,

2015, in discourse about “solipsism” contend that the mind can produce no ‘other’

(being) but the self). Albeit the production of fear via reflection of the self upon the

external strongly suggests that ‘other’ exists if it is assumed that fear is the product of

disparity, it seems still two avenues of approach survive involving either:

1) Discourse that addresses to resolve paradox, necessarily existing from a

challenge to evolved reasoning for its’ existence, the experience of fear at the interface

of time acquired learning associated with the experience of phenomena and logical

contradiction arisen from abstraction, induction, involving the universal, a general

case, seeded from the imagination

2) Discourse that treats the world as a collection of phenomena exclusively

and rejects the existence of the general/universal case, perceives little priority for

instantiation.

If it remains for philosophical address whether an instantiatable facet exists, it

also remains to be clear that philosophy considers the topic of discovery both distinct

and partner to abstraction whereas science method is restricted to discovery as its’

modus operandi. The possibility for the existence of a universal that is separately

synthesised remains, one that addresses fear originating disparity inherent to

reflexive experience, and is also scientific in that it also entails discovery, exists

descriptively as a gap in explanation [Block & Stalnaker, 1999] as a facet of the

world that is undiscovered whether by reasoning alone or by discovery or reasoning

combined though it is accepted that such explanation entail discovery, the world as a

phenomenon itself, but to suggest contradictorily that the self-reflection, the product

of (fear producing) measureable, whether witnessible or other wise, disparity, is

abstractly predictable via the rendering of disparities between the self and the other

singularly in numerical form via rationalized method.

Розділ І. Inert matter/ Косна матерія

108 ISSN 2518-1866 (Online), ISSN 2307-3705 (Print). Philosophy & Cosmology 2016 (Vol. 17)

Figure 1: An egg shape from trigonometric functions

The proposed egg shape of space was discovered from intuition assuming 1) too

few graphing points would be obtained as the result of redundancy unless periods

of revolution were the product of pi divided by whole numbers, 2) the radius of light

emitted from a moving object would be eccentrically distributed between forwards and

reverse path as distance accomplished by light emitted in the reverse direction would be

of opposite sign. The egg space is considered open topologically; the surface is composed

of non-adjacent graph points. A cosmology involving the egg shape has been elaborated

that attaches ultimate priority to disposition and form [Kirsh, 2011, 2013, 2015].

In this presentation distinction will be made between universe and world,

“universe” will be presented as an instantiable facet of the discoverable “world”; the

discovery via computer experiment of an instantiable atemporal shape of space is

reported along with the vision of a world composed strictly of unique entities captured

in rational terms to example as the set of prime numbers, in geometrical terms as

constructions of semi-open mobius strips, in visual representation as connect-thedots

forms of otherwise open structures, in cosmological terms as a Sierpinskis’

carpet, triangles composed of lines and points made of semi-open mobius strips.

Figure 2a. Sierpinski’s carpet [Weisstein, 2014].

philosophy considers the topic of discovery both distinct and partner to abstraction whereas science method restricted to discovery as its’ modus operandi. The possibility for the existence of a universal that is separately

synthesised remains, one that addresses fear originating disparity inherent to reflexive experience, and is scientific in that it also entails discovery, exists descriptively as a gap in explanation [Block & Stalnaker, 1999] facet of the world that is undiscovered whether by reasoning alone or by discovery or reasoning combined though is accepted that such explanation entail discovery, the world as a phenomenom itself, but to suggest contradictorily

that the self-reflection, the product of (fear producing) measureable, whether witnessible or other wise, disparity, abstractly predictable via the rendering of disparities between the self and the other singularly in numerical form rationalized method.

Figure 1: An egg shape from trigonometric functions

The proposed egg shape of space was discovered from intuition assuming 1) too few graphing points would

be obtained as the result of redundancy unless periods of revolution were the product of pi divided by whole

numbers, 2) the radius of light emitted from a moving object would be eccentrically distributed between forwards

and reverse path as distance accomplished by light emitted in the reverse direction would be of opposite sign. egg space is considered open topologically; the surface is composed of non-adjacent graph points. A cosmology

involving the egg shape has been elaborated that attaches ultimate priority to disposition and form [Kirsh, 2011,

2013, 2015].

E/m= ΔV Slow Velocity^2/2 + ΔC Light Velocity^2

V=velocity of motion

C =Velocity of light (is applied as a variable)

R(a) Sin @ = Slow Velocity,

R(a) Cos @ = Δ Velocity of light

Radius(egg)/Radius(a) = [[(Sin theta)-(Cos theta)]^2 + (cos theta)^2+(Cos phi)^2]^(1/2)

10^14< theta,phi <10^17 d(theta,phi) =(10^17 10^14)/500 + 2.02 X 10^14

In this presentation distinction will be made between universe and world, “universe” will be presented an instantiable facet of the discoverable “world”; the discovery via computer experiment of an instantiable

atemporal shape of space is reported along with the vision of a world composed strictly of unique entities captured

in rational terms to example as the set of prime numbers, in geometrical terms as constructions of semi-open mobius

strips, in visual representation as connect-the-dots forms of otherwise open structures, in cosmological terms Sierpinskis’ carpet, triangles composed of lines and points made of semi-open mobius strips.

Marvin E. Kirsh What in the World is Universe? : A Prime Example

ISSN 2518-1866 (Online), ISSN 2307-3705 (Print). Philosophy & Cosmology 2016 (Vol. 17) 109

Figure 2b. Sierpinski’s triangle (iteration from a square) [Wikipedia, 2014b].

Sierpińskis’ Triangle (Figure 2) is constructed of equilateral triangles by producing

finite subdivisions of an equilateral triangle, it produces equilateral triangles;

expansion by placing test points outside of the triangle approaches an infinite

size triangle. Sierpińkis’ Triangle, extended to the Sierpińkis’ Carpet (Figure 2a)

[Weisstein, 2014a], a square or cubical carpet pattern, includes the three sided

triangle and a point from which the pattern is tested from either an internal or external

position to squares in the cubical; approach to or arrival at the Sierpińskis’ Triangle

results. Test with external points may result in approach to an infinite triangle. It is

contended here, if Sierpińkis’ Carpet is assumed to represent all of the possibilities

for real space, i.e. an infinite sized cubic space, if a triangle exists within it then all

areas are triangular. In corresponding construction, if an instance of a triangular

area is witnessed to consist elementally of distance, the witness pair and reference to

the witness pair, then triangular space is postulated to contain exclusively, distance,

the witness pair and a reference to it, i.e. 3 vertices. Nature is herein considered to

be regenerative, the third perspective and first perspective produce strictly third and

first perspectives in which there exists a phase difference between intercouses of the

first perspective and third perspective that constructs the first perspective involving

strictly displacement of the witness pair. Time exists strictly to the third perspective

while timeless displacement exists strictly to the witness pair. The described phase

difference can be alternately viewed per triginometic assignment of velocities in

the atemporal egg shape as a lag between potential energy, i.e. force, and kinetic

energy, i.e. displacement occurred at the first perspective as it is witnessed from the

time possessing third perspective. Thus either perspective, first or third, does and

does not embody time or distance, either is always out of phase with the other; 2

additional vertices to the given 3 concerning displacement of the third perspective

and the witness pair surface to the perspective entailing strictly displacement, i.e.

does not embody time. In analogy, as advanced above, vision does and does not

owe motion to its representations, the mind possesses simultaneously to/for its’

existence, the rational and, born from it, the absurd as simply as the mind is absent

at birth to speak of it, yet present at death to know infinitely more of it. It is science

that insists on investigating birth simply because it is cloaked in darkness, yet the

rational approach of science must also account for birth that can be nothing other

than immaculate at its beginning. For the mathematician this can be nothing other

than relentfully stressful. It is much less weighty to consider processes to proceed

from death, concepts for explanation derived from what no longer possesses motion.

In discourses [Hutcheon, 1995] concerning truth and science as Karl Popper argues

for falsifyability as the only suitable test for the truth of science theory, Thomas Kuhn

contests that science has no real escape from its original setting, its’ virtue existing

to concepts subsequently extracted and the verisimilitude or truthfull appearance

of associated interpretation. It is reflexive to think that truth should bear weight to

anchor life unmovingly yet it appears to be knowable best from witness of death,

Розділ І. Inert matter/ Косна матерія

110 ISSN 2518-1866 (Online), ISSN 2307-3705 (Print). Philosophy & Cosmology 2016 (Vol. 17)

ironic that seeking the truth from the processes of birth produces fear that blindly

surmounts generations, is derived from the self reflection. Though meliorism, the

idea holding that human interference with natural processes produces an improved

outcome, seems the accepted course guide, the reasoning outlined here can be argued

to suggest that blind faith is the better/safest choice. Of critical importance towards

the beneficial application of science to nature is the elaboration of an ethic that has

as progenitor neither morals derived from culture nor religously, but is inherent to

nature and life. Important for productive reflection is the creation of an alternative

to the commonly assumed world representation involving topologically closed

connect-the-dots figures or the points of mathematical curves that are continuous.

Figure 3. The Open Mobius Strip

The planar strip can be dissected laterally into triangles as the whole approaches

closure resembling a mobius strip but with turns of less than 180 degrees. The

mobius also possesses a chirality depending on the direction of the twist. As an

example of a natural pattern DNA can be synthesized in a blunted mobius form

[Han et al, 2010] though the only known example of the mobius in nature is in the

form of a cyclic peptide [Wikipedia, 2014a]. It is postulated that “open Mobius” DNA

exists from the temporal rather than physical perspective as a non-closed temporal

or transcendental form that bridges generations and species (see [Starostin & Van

der Heuden, 2007]).

The example of Sierpińskis’ Triangle can be extended: the rectangular “open

mobius strip” (Figure 5) rather than the “point” and line can be used to construct

‘Sierpińkis’ Carpet’: the mobius strip existing to observation as lines and points is

translated to exist in the open form in which physical ratios produce either the line or

“geometrical point” bearing a history that exists neither philosophically nor physically

no further beyond the door of the skin bearing entity (it is considered that skin divides

intracellular structure such as golgi apparatus, mitochondria, chromatin, nucleus,

synthesis and replication complexes from witness that are at least discernable with

stains and the light microscope, e.g. possess history and motion, but not to other

entities such as elements, compounds, DNA/RNA bases, etc. that require other

types of prosthetics for their witness and investigation. Substituting the mobius

for the connecting line in the creation of triangles within Sierplinskis’ carpet lends

chirality to the model; a left handed mobius will produce a left handed universe, etc.

Tracing outward from a point beneath the skin of the inner most triangle produces

an unacceptable change in chirility/direction of the arrow of time, hence the internal

point is considered historyless. Temporally rather than physically continuous (“open

Mobius”) DNA is viewed to construct nature, connect species and individuals. Time

is seen to proceed unidirectionally along the chirality bearing twists of the mobius.

It is of special consequence that the mobius has a right or left chirality depending on

orientation when it is closed, in Sierpińskis’ triangle all descendents of right or left

handed chirality are right or left handed respectively, one precludes the other.

Marvin E. Kirsh What in the World is Universe? : A Prime Example

ISSN 2518-1866 (Online), ISSN 2307-3705 (Print). Philosophy & Cosmology 2016 (Vol. 17) 111

If it is a truth that the world is composed strictly of uniqueness and a truth that

amount and sequence supervene over existence, it should be, if the prime numbers,

divisible only by themselves and one, each unique, are sufficient for explanation, that

coherent analogy exists to elementary qualia of entities and phenomena, motion and

form, that is instantiatable universally. If it is wished to fill the “explanation gap” with

the “gap between prime numbers” prime gap distances can be envisioned between

arbitrary surface points of the egg shape in which one point serves as the causitive locus

of points in other egg surfaces; all surface points of spaces are postulated displaced

from those of other spaces by prime gap distances to ascend upon a unique causation

locus (see below discussion of TK5/planar knots-for the egg, though 6 vertices/2 per

axis are initially projected it is possible that 1 of the 6 vertices/witness points is always

unwitnessible/historyless ). A specific unique path can be abstracted to exist for all

points such that surface points of an egg space taken two at a time in pairs can be

assigned non prime/non-unique distances of separation: from the third perspective the

surface is wholly unique, from the first perspective the self is constructed of soldiers.

For an egg shaped sea of egg shapes, “universe”, contained to and governing ‘world’ that

in turn acts to propagate ‘universe’, the surface skin of the unique space is interpreted

to be continually growing uniqueness, while beneath it the continual becoming of

likeness/familiarity produces the individual, observed species and categories of nature;

the pause between potential and motion (sin (@) — cos(@)) at the point of witness

is proposed to divide the recombinatory power of potential and absolute uniqueness

that emanates as a combined character from the surface of structure. It has recently

been reported that planks constant describing the relation of energy and wavelength

of electromagnetic radiation is highly variable to be almost random depending on

test criteria and parameters [Ballantine et. al., 2016]. The authors consider a world of

(almost limitless) varieties of quantimizations possible is the experiment employs a

specific shape embedded inside the crystal used in the experiment. It has also recently

been discovered [Gionannini, 2014] that velocity of the light ray varies with shape of

the photon; treated other than one dimensionally as in existing models, the photon can

be given a shape and its’ velocity measured directly by experiment in the laboratory.

Theoretical physicists reasoning the profound difficulty to find evidence of the birth of

the universe, uncertain of the nature of the evidence they seek might be, have recently

mounted a penetrating study of the skies for triangular shapes [Wolchover, 2016b]. In

attempts to capture to method the topic of black holes that are predicted not to exhibit

event horizons some researchers predict the analytically based extraction from data of

egg shaped shadows [Wade, 2016], other researchers conjecture to image the surfaces

of black holes as two dimensional representations of holographic spaces [Crew, 2016].

Imagining the night sky it is conceivable that it would be paradoxical for scientists

to rigidly qualify unique meaning concerning universe and world from the story

telling connect-the-dots figures in constellations if the composing masses/stars and

vast distances involved entail the possession of unobvious history of whatever actual

constitution, primes gaps/unique distances from other objects. As in the instance of

constellations, potentially embodying simultaneously the character of both universe

and world, a character of nature to dig holes/temporal/energy-shapes with contours

exactly conformed to the shapes of evolved matter/substance/physical emergences

seems more appropriate in approach than interpretation involving ubiquities and

constants involving strict adherence to the rational.

Розділ І. Inert matter/ Косна матерія

112 ISSN 2518-1866 (Online), ISSN 2307-3705 (Print). Philosophy & Cosmology 2016 (Vol. 17)

Analogy must suitably accommodate to capture cognition in a way that it is

not something added up as one might add with an abacus as if it is closed within a

container. Determination of properties carried out by a lag between potential and

motion can be envisioned in which complete mismatch to the setting of becoming

possibility is an impossibility. Temporal rather than physical contiguity supervenes

as the necessary agent of emergence.

Harboring assumption that infinite objects exist in nature, in attempts to bridge,

the ideal, rational and natural, mathematicians have produced models with which

to classify logical systems according to their strength, weak or strong; weak logic is

associated with the existence of the finite, physical reality, strong logic is associated

with the ideal/infinity. In the developed system, the potential to sort divisions

among the finite and infinite is lost to analytical complexity when triplets rather

than pairs of numbers are extracted for test. The perspective is supposed to enable

scientists the ability to engender plausible rational interpretation from physical

encounter that does not resolve to be hopelessly amorphic in the case assuming

capable rational universal goverence. The potential existential dependence of

cognition itself upon both finite (the rigid) and infinite (i.e. the amorphous) terms,

a possible capture of the nature of cognition itself involving the mathematically

rational is obviously not a reflected character of analysis.

If the existence of physical definition is necessary to capture reasoning ability

it becomes incoherent to assume the existence of the infinite object; reasoning

as a phenomenom existing in domains beyond the finite could not exist beyond

the dimensions of its’ cage, existing inherently is but one case that excludes the

instantiation of mathematical recursives from the domain of the never ending. In

analogy, if the human mind and physiology are elaborated as bits of information

(exampled in the expression “a million monkeys typing for a million years would

produce the works of Shakespeare”), a non-crossing point can be envisioned

to occur between domains of body and mind and spatial domains consisting of

multitudes greater number of bits, such vastnesses do not exist as a source for

reflection/re-reflection in discussion of phenomena or as disparities from self that

can be members of the set of bits composing cognitive ability or its products.

Regarding uniqueness/primes, equality/disparity/a world of overlap/

intercourses and the capture of finite terms to the realm of infinity, of particular

interest is the claim of a proof for the ABC conjecture by Shinichi Mochizuki, a

Japanese mathematician.

The ABC conjecture states:

for whole numbers a,b,c having no common prime factors

if a + b = c then

but for a finite number bof ruled cases (prime factors a) X (prime factors b) X

(prime factors c) =/> c.

For exempted cases (prime factors a) X (prime factors b) X (prime factors

c) =/< c. The exemptions here seem vital to argument concerning nature and

mathematics:

1) A changing value for space in a setting of overlapping spaces can be

conjectured for a natural world constructed of active intercourses; if absolute total

values in accounting columns are not knowable they can be construed not to exist.

It is important to note that the whole width of the intact closed physical mobius, i.e.

Marvin E. Kirsh What in the World is Universe? : A Prime Example

ISSN 2518-1866 (Online), ISSN 2307-3705 (Print). Philosophy & Cosmology 2016 (Vol. 17) 113

has other than an abstracted mathematical existence, must be less than twice the

width of an unsealed strip in order to avoid physical constraint precluding physical

existence. Physical surfaces existing in extended description of the abc conjecture

are topologically closed, i.e. inequality is not a facet, discussion must be adjusted

to the exempted case condition, a + b < c :

(prime factor a) X (prime factor b) X (prime factor c) < c

The abc conjecture assumes importance with the added stipulation that the real

sum of values in natural spaces are ubiquitously less than their obvious sum. In

referral to actual nature only the condition a + b < c is considered viable.

On inspection two worlds are potentially describable, a world comprised strictly

of primes/uniques, and a world possessing redundancies or identical soldiers; if it

is assumed that from any position of reference it is possible only to reference the

former, the latter, a world of identical soldiers, can be abstracted to exist from that

perspective, if not effected to exist via the application of impulse using prosthetics

to extend perspective of the senses.

(a + b) = c, the non existent abstracted total can be referred to a world possessing

soldiers (of prime c). The only possible exclusion of soldiers from a setting entails

the failed existence of witnessible totals. Current struggle existing over “the

continuance of physics, as we know it” has been narrowed to the impossibility of

proving the “multiverse” conjecture that is advanced as axiom by those obsessed

with the positive alignment of empirical data with abstracted theory.

The following ruled exception is offered in an example of the ab c hypothesis.

a= A= -1, b=2^(6n), c (i.e. a+b) =63 (A = -1 is substituted for a to indicate actual

nature that extends indefinitely towards the past.

for all values of n, 63 turns up as a factor of c, thus c always descends or ascends

from identical soldiers of 3 and 7 in abstracted worlds with the existing total = 63n.

The third party reference from which temporal observation is possible, entailing,

in a world restricted by definition to contain motion, the displacement of a third

witness and a witness pair, to gain from these three soldiers of abstraction combined

with motion that is beyond perception, an additional two vertices forming in

imagined connect-the-dot fashion a perspective framing five sided pentagon that is

present to the mind that ubiquitously seeks totals for navigation. Two’s company,

three’s a crowd, seven a crowd of two crowds, might suffice to describe the streets

of London for Shakespeare in the everywhere gaze of the Mona Lisa by Da Vinci

that has been modelled geometrically using the golden number and a pentagon to

demonstrate artistically engineered perspective.

In a proof involving graph theory, knots that are connected and non-planar, i.e.

have TK5, mathematicians from Georgia Tech have shown that for planar graphs

there is always a way to draw them so that the lines from point to point do not

cross. [Condie, 2016]. If it is axiomatic to witness that intercourses of agents are

one-at-time, i.e. witness is in pairs, according to the proof regardless of how vast

in length a knot is entailed to a chain of events, if perspective is described as above

in terms of the displacement of both the witness pair and a third perspective of

observation producing 5 vertices, a perspective of observation of the knot should

always exist involving 5 vertices and connections that do not physically cross,

Розділ І. Inert matter/ Косна матерія

114 ISSN 2518-1866 (Online), ISSN 2307-3705 (Print). Philosophy & Cosmology 2016 (Vol. 17)

i.e. an event of observation to witness in pairs entails displacement/motion and

witness in pairs to all events. Though the connection of points to form 5 sided

figures entails physical connect-the-dots contiguity that is not a supposed necessity

of possibility, the possibility of its’ creation and the everywhere impression of the

gaze of the Mona Lisa is timeless. The visual representation is proposed to exist

other than as if machined, but freely, as the product of disparity to the internal as

energy is received from external spaces; the philosophical character of perspective

is identical internally and externally, possessing infinity, i.e. that inaccessible to

introspection, and finiteness as the view of an object is finite, contained similarly

at its locus to “universe-containing world”, the same within as without. Though it

does seem possible but unlikely for more stringent limits of knowability, limited

possibility for explanation, it is reasonable to argue that life is endowed with nor

requires ‘other’ beyond.

Figure 4a. A five sided figure and the The Golden Number A sixth ubiquitously invisible

vertices that cannot be associated with a knowable total/numerical accounting, is postulated.

It is represented (-1) in the prime set [(2^6n) -(A=(1)]

Figure 4b. The Golden Number demonstrates physical discontinuity that constructs the

visual representation. (a bisected line, ratio of the shorter length to the longer length = ratio

of the longer length to whole length) http://alexpetty.com/2010/01/10/the-golden-ratio/

Marvin E. Kirsh What in the World is Universe? : A Prime Example

ISSN 2518-1866 (Online), ISSN 2307-3705 (Print). Philosophy & Cosmology 2016 (Vol. 17) 115

Figure 4c. Perspective in the Mona Lisa, The golden triangle, “Two’s company,

three’s a crowd”

Unorderability of causation confined to physical description entails to reason the

unreasonable existence of operations that are non-commutative; i.e. the outcome, c,

depends on the temporal order of a and b. It might be extrapolated that the existence

of time/motion precludes an exact tabulation of order. If prime can be used truthfully

to represent uniqueness as is here suggested, and the exceptions given by the ABC

conjecture is sufficient as an example to construct a domain for the natural world, this

author finds the proof of the ABC conjecture questionable; the distribution of primes/

uniqueness, of inequality over a domain divided between the infinite and the finite

becomes unhandleably paradoxical unless time, hence (the logically impossible) time

point zero has become a veiled component hidden within proof construction. It should

be noted that in the absence of a spatial domain absent of motion, i.e. historyless to the

psyche, existing internally to the miniscule and externally to the vast, the impossibility

of rationally construed reverse time exists. In analogy, rigorous rationality extended

from finite to infinite may allow the mathematical prediction of a numerical value

to, for instance, the distance of a squirrel in a tree to the ground; the projection of a

knowable history to elements witnessed only with prosthetics devices operating from

a third witnes perspective deductively leads the cognition to also construe the possible

temporal reversal of relative motions directly witnessed by the unaided senses, i.e. the

squirrel moving backwards in time from ground to perch in tree.

Conclusion

A world constituted of shape is proposed. Shapes introduced include the three

dimensional egg shape, the triangle, pentagon, cube, the helix of DNA, the screw

shaped void in the crystal used to investigate Planks constant.

Розділ І. Inert matter/ Косна матерія

116 ISSN 2518-1866 (Online), ISSN 2307-3705 (Print). Philosophy & Cosmology 2016 (Vol. 17)

In order to bridge paradoxes for explanation, the employment of scientific

method in the construction of cosmologies is not clear concerning what is observable

as that which strictly encompasses the material world as one might refer to the earth

as world; however more is achieved and with no less rigor but added depth and

awareness given in considerations of the limitations and entailments of perspective,

and concerning possibility for instantiation to limit itself to the character of unaided

proximal experience. It is here asserted that the concept ‘history’ as it relates to the

path of emergence of materials and processes suffers poor definition in evolved

science theory and modeling that focuses heavily on symmetry. Science has failed

to discern the potential for distinct cases of vast amounts/infinities, action at a

distance that is an illusion of the rational attempting to deal with the infinite, vast

and small amounts, and the existence of motionless/historyless spaces as far as

cognition is concerned. It is plausible to claim the capture of historyless/motionless

to space rationally by other than science method; science excludes particulars from

transmitted meaning to include only extracted concepts, necessarily, logically

bypassing topics of “the concept” itself, the mind, the spirit.

 

References

Ballantine, Kyle, E., John F. Donegan, John, F. and Eastham, Paul, R. “There are

many ways to spin a photon: Half-quantization of a total optical angular

momentum”, Science Advances 29: Vol. 2, no. 4, April 2016.

http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/4/e1501748

Beyer, Christian, Husserl, 2015. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/husserl/

Block, N. and Stalnaker, R. 1999. Conceptual analysis, dualism and the explanatory

gap. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 108, No. 1 (Jan., 1999), pps. 1-46. http://

www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=the+philosophical+review+108+block&

source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiVs-ajyP3OAhVLph4KHe-_DlAQFggjMA

A&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyu.edu%2Fgsas%2Fdept%2Fphilo%2Ffacult

y%2Fblock%2Fpapers%2FExplanatoryGap.pdf&usg=AFQjCNEocGHiN43vo

TXTBlkvAwTUmAtb7A

Castelvecchi, Davide, “The biggest mystery in mathematics: Shinichi Mochizuki and

the impenetreable proof”, Nature.com News Feature, Oct 15, 2015. http://

www.nature.com/news/the-biggest-mystery-in-mathematics-shinichimochizuki-

and-the-impenetrable-proof-1.18509

Condie, Bill, “Maths mystery solved after 40 years” Cosmos News, 30 May 2016.

https://cosmosmagazine.com/mathematics/maths-mystery-solved-after-40-

years

Crew, Bec, The case for black holes being nothing but holograms just got even

stronger, Science Alert, June 1, 2016. http://www.sciencealert.com/the-casefor-

black-holes-being-nothing-but-holographic-images-just-got-stronger

Gionannini, Daniel, Romero, Jacquiline, Potocek, Vaclav, Ferenczi, Gerely, Speirits,

Stephen, Barnett, Daniele, M., Faccio, Paegett, M.J., Photons that travelin free

space slower than the speed of light, 2014. http://arxiv.org/ abs/1411.3987

Han, Dongran, Pal Suchetan, Liu, Yan, and Yan, Hao, Folding and cutting DNA into

reconfigurable topological nanostructures, Nature Nanotechnology, vol 8 no

5 pps. 12-71, 2010.

Marvin E. Kirsh What in the World is Universe? : A Prime Example

ISSN 2518-1866 (Online), ISSN 2307-3705 (Print). Philosophy & Cosmology 2016 (Vol. 17) 117

Hegel, G.W. The phenomenology of Mind, Dover Publications, 2003.

Hutcheon, P. D., Popper and Kuhn on the Evolution of Science, Brock Review (1995)

ol. 4, No. 1/2, p.28-37. http://humanists.net/pdhutcheon/Papers%20and%20

Presentations/Popper%20and%20Kuhn%20on%20the%20Evolution%20

of%20Science.htm

Kirsh, Marvin, E., The Spaces of the Looking Glass: Framing the still/ stilling the

frame, Philosophy and Cosmology Vol 15, pages 62-83, 2015. http://www.

ispcjournal.org/en/2016.html

Kirsh Marvin E., Determining the Determined State : A Sizing of Size From Aside/

the Amassing of Mass by a Mass, Philosophical Papers and Review, Vol. 4 no.

4 pps. 49-65, September 2013.

http://www.academicjournals. org/journal/PPR/article-abstract/51B4FE541410

Kirsh Marvin, E., Evolution at the Surface of Euclid: Elements of A Long Infinity in

Motion Along Space, International Journal of Arts and Science, Vol 4 No 2

pps. 71-96, 2011. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1575622

Levinas, Emmanuel, Totality and Infinity, Duquesne, 1969.

Wade, Lizzie, The Death of General Relativity Lurks in a Black Holes’ Shadow, Wired

1/27/2016 http://www.wired.com/2016/01/the-death-of-general-relativitylurks-

in-a-black-holes-shadow/

Weisstein, Eric W. “Sierpińki Carpet.” From MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SierpinskiCarpet.html, 2014.

Wikipedia, Cyclotide, 2014a, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclotide.

Wikipedia, Sierpinski triangle, 2014b. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_

triangle.

Wolchover, Natalie, Mathematicians Bridge Finite-Infinite Divide, Quanta

Magazine May 24 2016a. https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160524-

mathematicians-bridge-finite-infinite-divide/

Wolchover, Natalie, Physicists Hunt for the Big Bang’s Triangles, Quanta Magazine

April 19 2016b. https://www.quantamagazine.org/20160419-string-inflationtriangles/

Supplementary material

I’ve discovered that the mathematics in my paper “What in the World is Universe?…” may not be clear to all readers.

Please consider the following: A world of identical soldiers can be represented 2^n in which it is also stipulated that there is no overlap of the spaces attributed to the individual. Given in the abc conjecture (a + b)/2 = c/2 (c/2 represents reverse generation doublings and aligns to represent the case of a world of identical soldiers). It is stipulated for a world of uniquenesses (uniques, primes, prime a’s and b’s conceived to be the consequnce of the overlap of spaces) that a + b < c, given as a possibility for the exploited abc conjecture exemption case containing the function b = 2^(6n). (2^6n) – 1 is always factorable by 63 (prime factors 3, 7) for all values of n-i.e. multiplication, e.g. prime a X prime b X prime c >=c is considered in terms of addition rather than multiplication. A world of both soldiers and unique entities is logically excluded, all space is unique. I envision a world captured to primes (1,2,3,5,7), discontinuity, witness pairs, and two’s company three’s a crowd. Entailed – unique space is created; the first perspective observer within the witness pair entails only atemporal displacement, has no force associated with it, i.e. during embryonic development (spaces may be smaller in a shrinking world but their creation does not entail force.