Review excerpts: British Idealist Studies series

Matt Carter, T.H. Green and the Development of Ethical Socialism

  • "Carter has done a great service to the Labour movement by attempting to bring Green back into the mainstream of socialist thought . . . an excellent study."  Roy Hattersley, New Statesman
  • "Students of British political thought and ideology as well as of Green will learn much from Carter's book". Avital Simhony, Ethics
  • "Erudite and scholarly."  Jonathan Warner, The European Legacy
  • "Carter makes the link between the philosophical debates of the late Victorian era and today's politics."   Paul Richards, Fabian Review
  • "An excellent guide to Green's thought and influence . . . remarkably accessible for a reworked PhD thesis."  Andrew Bradstock, Christian Socialist Magazine
  • "A good read for all those wanting to understand what makes New Labour tick."  The Guardian
  • "There is little that is new in life or politics. Someone has always been here before. Green has been here before. He was right then and is even more right now. The book tells us how and why."  Neal Lawson, Renewal
  • "A serious read, richly annotated with footnotes and packed with new research . . . it takes effort to read and comprehend, but the effort is worth it." Labour History
  • "An interesting theme of the book is the link between 'new' liberalism and 'new' Labour."  Martin Jenkins, Tribune
  • "The great strength of the book is its defence of the importance of Green's work in the history of ideas and, in particular, the development of New Liberalism. It is well argued and sensitive to the various historical controversies surrounding the persons involved, as well as that of Green's legacy." Thom Brooks, Political Studies Review
  • "Carter discusses well the impact of the idea of democratic equality (coupled with positive freedom) on Green's rejection of the negative minimal state of laissez-faire liberalism." Avital Simhony, British Journal of Politics and International Relations
  • "A very well constructed and timely book which provides a trenchant, intelligent and well argued reassessment of Green's impact on twentieth century ideological thought and socialist thinking in particular. Andrew Vincent, Collingwood and British Idealism Studies.
  • "Ideas born in the nineteenth century can significantly influence government and society in the twenty-first, which is what makes the study of Green and his followers relevant today."  Jonathan Warner, The European Legacy
  • "Carter presents a strong case for the influence of idealism during the formative years of the Labour Party . . . There is much to learn from Carter's book, both for scholars of idealism and for those interested in Labour Party ideology."  Colin Tyler, History of European Ideas.
  • "Provides the reader with a satisfying scholarly picture of the broader import of Green's thought (and of Idealism) on a range of philosophical, political, religious and economic issues."  Andrew Vincent, Victorian Studies.
  • Denys Leighton, The Greenian Moment

  • "An impressive and scholarly historical study of Green's thought and political activism. Leighton presents a strong case and does so in a style that is both lucid and engaging." Colin Tyler, European Journal of Political Theory
  • " . . . especially impressive in the scholarly way that it traces Green’s debts in this area to German theological thought, and particularly to Pietism. Moreover, Leighton is unquestionably right that examining Green in this way does help to shed light on his work in general, so that not only is Green’s relationship with Kant and Hegel clarified somewhat, but also the nature of his radicalism becomes easier to identify."  Edmund Neill, English Historical Review
  • "Leighton makes a compelling argument that Green's philosophy and sociopolitical ideology, far from a departure from religion, are in fact substantially religious in character."  John Vickery, J. Religion
  • "A work of particularly outstanding scholarship: literally no stone is left unturned in this exhaustive and well-written examination of Green's philosophical views in the light of contemporary debates." Thom Brooks, THES
  • "Leighton's study is probably the richest assessment of Green's religious ideas among the present books."  Andrew Vincent, Victorian Studies.
  • Ben Wempe, T.H. Green's Theory of Positive Freedom

  • "Ben Wempe's TH Green's Theory of Positive Freedom may be heavy going at times, but it is essential reading for anyone who thinks that the Labour government should do more than pluck individual initiatives out of the air."  Roy Hattersley, The Guardian
  • "A serious and significant contribution to this rich and growing literature." Colin Tyler, European Journal of Political Theory
  • "Anyone seeking an overview of the place of liberty in Green's thought will find Wempe's study helpful."  Luke O'Sullivan, British Journal for the History of Philosophy
  • "Wempe makes a powerful case both for his interpretation of Green's theory of positive freedom and positive freedom more generally." Thom Brooks, THES
  • "Deeply interesting . . . Wempe's book is rich in scholarly content and argument and embodies a deep knowledge of Green's work that repays intensive study."  Andrew Vincent, Victorian Studies.
  • Alberto de Sanctis, The 'Puritan' Democracy of T.H. Green

  • De Sanctis is to be contratulated. Anyone interested in European Liberalism will neeed to read this book and I look forward to his future publications. R.J. Halliday, Australian Journal of Politics and History
  • "An excellent discussion of Green's contributions to democratic theory and political obligation." Thom Brooks, THES
  • James Connelly, Metaphysics, Method and Politics

  • "James Connelly's closely argued work, part of an excellent series on British idealists, achieves more than its primary purpose of refuting the suggestion of a 'radical breach' in Collingwood's output. It is also a valuable introduction to ideas which remain consistent, whether published or left in manuscript form."  Mark Garnett, Times Literary Supplement
  • "Exegesis of the highest quality."  Andrew Lockyer, History of Political Thought
  • "Collingwood's 'big worry' -- the nature of the unity of thought and action -- could not have found a better or a more discriminating analyst." Peter Johnson, Contemporary Political Theory
  • "A valuable and commendable contribution to the study of Collingwood's philosophy. . . . especially useful to the Collingwood scholar in that it draws extensively from the unpublished manuscripts." Richard Murphy, Collingwood and British Idealism Studies.
  • "This book is a sustained detailed systematic analysis of Collingwood's work and Connelly's enthusiasm shines through."  Matt Sleat, Political Studies Review
  •  "Connelly is good agt drawing out meaning from Collingwood's sometimes abstruse and ambiguous prose." Martin Stuart-Fox, Australian Journal of Politics and History
  • "Set apart from much previous Collingwood scholarship by the author's commanding knowledge and extensive use of Collingwood's unpublished manuscripts and correspondence."  Timothy C. Lord, Philosophical Books
  • Marnie Hughes-Warrington, 'How Good an Historian Shall I Be?'

  • "In short, to this reviewer’s mind, Hughes-Warrington has written an exemplary book. . . . Indeed, of the very many books about Collingwood during the years of his most intense re-assessment it is this one that most reflects the spirit of Collingwood’s own way of doing philosophy. " Peter Johnson, History of Political Thought
  • "This is a good book . . . a good solid review of a very complex topic. The book is a very useful addition to the academic history library as a detailed and updated guide to Collingwood's oevre."  Tony Taylor, History Australia
  • "Hughes-Warrington makes a powerful case for the inclusion of Collingwood’s ideas in any philosophy of education on which policy is to be based — to apply both within the

  • educational system and Academy, and beyond in the wider society." Martin Stuart-Fox, Australian Journal of Politics and History
  • "I should conclude by emphasizing that, for all my carping, Hughes-Warrington’s monograph remains a very clear and useful study of a seldom discussed aspect of Collingwood’s philosophy as well as a valuable attempt at situating it within currents issues in (mainly British) history education today." Chinatsu Kobayashi, Collingwood and British Idealism Studies
  • Ian Tregenza, Michael Oakeshott on Hobbes

  • "A history of ideas that ranges with formidable learning."  Peter Coleman, Quadrant.
  • "Ian Tregenza’s meticulous study shows how Oakeshott deployed selective readings of Hobbes to support his own developing ideas." Mark Garnett, Conservative History Journal
  • "The book sheds considerable light on the thought of Oakeshott and on how it may be clarified by looking at the ways in which he used Hobbes's thought to reflect on politics in the broadest context." James G. Mellon, Political Studies Review
  • "This is a skillfully posed and smartly analysed work that offers a definitive analysis of neither Oakeshott nor Hobbes but confronts the reader with an intriguing view of a philosophical relationship. . . Tregenza’s work makes a fine contribution as the third book in a significant series on Oakeshott."  Steven Gerencser, History of Political Thought
  • Stein Helgeby, Action as History

  • "An impressive piece of writing . . . one of the best discussions of Collingwood’s logic of question and answer I have encountered." Peter Johnson, History of Political Thought
  • "By anchoring Collingwood’s philosophy of history firmly in his philosophy of mind, Helgeby provides a timely reminder that history is something more serious than

  • imaginative play with texts."  Martin Stuart-Fox, Australian Journal of Politics and History

    Luke O'Sullivan, Oakeshott on History

  • "Oakeshott's later philosophy is immensely dense and intricate, and is already provoking a notable literature of interpretation. O'Sullivan's Oakeshott on History is a most impressive contribution to it." Kenneth Minogue, Times Literary Supplement
  • "O'Sullivan not only relies on Oakeshott's published works, he is the first researcher to make use of the collection of Oakeshott's papers at the London School of Economics. This newly accessible source of information allows O'Sullivan to provide a detailed account of the evolution of Oakeshott's ideas on the subject of history. . . O'Sullivan provides a fascinating and detailed account of Oakeshott's ideas both on the history of political thought and the philosophy of history. This is an impressive undertaking and the result is a comprehensive understanding of Oakeshott's ideas on history.'  Natalie Riendeau, Collingwood and British Idealism Studies
  • "In this scholarly and carefully written book Luke O’Sullivan provides a more sustained and comprehensive treatment of Oakeshott’s views on history than any so far attempted."   Nevil Johnson, History of Political Thought
  • "Luke O’Sullivan traces Oakeshott’s developing ideas with commendable clarity, drawing on unpublished manuscripts and enlivening his account with biographical snippets."  Mark Garnett, Conservative History Journal
  • "A very helpful and welcome volume which may prompt working historians to find out what one of the greatest historical thinkers of the twentieth century actually said."  Michael Bentley, English Historical Review
  • "One of the many virtues of his book is the amazing degree of discipline with which he confines his study to its subject: Oakeshott's philosophy of history." Alex Astrov, Contemporary Political Theory
  • "O'Sullivan's book is well worth reading as a guide to Oakeshott on history; I recommend it."  Rex Martin, History and Theory
  • Roy Tseng, The Sceptical Idealist: Michael Oakeshott as a Critic of the Enlightenment

  • 'Roy Tseng meticulously reconstructs Oakeshott's views across their full range and adeptly weaves the disparate strands together into a coherent and plausible whole.'  Graeme Garrard, Political Studies Review
  • 'One of the real virtues of Tseng’s approach is that it enables him to make connections between Oakeshott and other trends in modern philosophy, as well as to tie together some of the seemingly diverse strands within Oakeshott’s thought itself.’  Ian Tregenza, History of Political Thought
  • ‘Tseng’s book offers an interesting effort to make Oakeshott’s thought a plausible non-foundational alternative to post-modernism and reactionary traditionalism in reaction to the crisis of the Enlightenment project.’ Natalie Riendeau, Collingwood and British Idealism Studies
  • 'Essential reading.'  Max Payne, Network
  • "A vindication of Oakeshott's philosophy of experience as a critique of the Enlightenment project." Alex Astrov, Contemporary Political Theory
  • "Among a plethora of books on Oakeshott’s philosophy, the most thorough and efficacious I’ve read." Bob Cheeks, Intellectual Conservatism
  • Efraim Podoksik, In Defence of Modernity: Vision and Philosophy in Michael Oakeshott

  • "This is an excellent and illuminating book."  John Charvet, History of Political Thought
  • "Podoksik shows how the somewhat problematic notion of practice as a modality of experience in the early work . . . culminated in the mature category of conduct featured in On Human Conduct."  George Feaver, Times Literary Supplement
  • "In a wide-ranging and perceptive account, Podoksik presents Oakeshott as a defender of modernity, despite his acute awareness of its various dilemmas." Mark Garnett, Conservative History Journal
  • "The book is a superb text for both the novice and the seasoned Oakeshott reader. The former will find a refreshingly clear exposition of Oakeshott's work considered as a whole. The latter will find a bold statement challenging some entrenched interpretations." Leslie Marsh,Political Studies Review
  • "The book as a whole is a major contribution to the scholarly literature on Oakeshott. . . . Podoksik’s central thesis—that Oakeshott wanted to defend the plurality and fragmentation of modern life—is surely right."  Elizabeth Corey, Society
  • This study is a full and highly engaging account of one of the twentieth century’s major political thinkers . .  .the strength of this book does not lie in its precise political characterisation of Oakeshott, but in its wider and more ambitious attempt to locate the Oakeshottean project in the context of modern British and European thought." Richard Bourke, The European Legacy