
Current Issue Reviews
Contents, Abstracts & Index Subscriptions Special
Issues
Special Offer The
"Hard Problem" Full
Text Editors
Authors' Guide
Tucson Reports JCS-Online Conscious
Experience Imprint Academic
How does the mind relate to the brain?
Can computers ever be conscious?
What do we mean by subjectivity and the
self?
These questions are being keenly debated in fields as diverse as cognitive
science, neurophysiology and philosophy. The Journal of Consciousness
Studies is a peer-reviewed journal which examines these issues in plain
English.
"Do we need this journal? . . . Yes, we do: there is no other
journal quite like it, and one day we shall, I think, look back to its
appearance as a defining moment . . . and at the price, it's a snip!"
Jeffrey Gray, Nature
"With JCS, consciousness studies has arrived."
Susan Greefield, Times
Higher Education Supplement
"There is a need for a journal that will publish high-quality
work on consciousness while being at the same time less tied down by rigid
views as to the suitability of material than most journals. One hopes that
the promise of this first issue will be fulfilled."
Brian Josephson, Times Higher
Education Supplement.
"It is pleasant that we are promised discussions in the humanities
as well as in science, with papers on culture and on the philosophy of
mind slated for future issues. It will continue to have something for everybody."
David Chalmers, Times Literary
Supplement.
"A volatile mixture of refereed articles, interviews and conference
reports from all camps (reductionist to mystical) in one of the most exciting
areas of research and theory-making."
Gene Feder, The Lancet.
"Its advisory board is a roll-call of the biggest names in consciousness
publishing."
John Cornwell, The Tablet.
"You guys have a marvelous magazine. You publish a lot of things
that would not be published in routine philosophical and scientific journals,
and that seems to me exactly right at our present state of the investigation
of consciousness. We don't know how it works and we need to try all kinds
of different ideas."
John Searle (recorded interview with
Anthony Freeman).
A New
Multi-Disciplinary Subject?
Over the last few years, research into consciousness has at last become
accepted within the academic community. As John Searle puts it, raising
the subject of consciousness in cognitive science discussions is no longer
considered to be ``bad taste'', causing graduate students to ``roll their
eyes at the ceiling and assume expressions of mild disgust.''
But why are we interested in consciousness? Most people are interested
not just because of the academic and interdisciplinary challenges, but
because of their personal experience - we have consciousness, we experience
it; perhaps we even think that we ``are'' it. But, if we are to make progress
in studying consciousness, we will have to think about it very clearly,
and engage in serious constructive dialogues between a variety of viewpoints.
And that is the purpose of this journal.
The field of consciousness studies is at a very early stage, characterized
by crude theories, most of which are unlikely to stand the test of time.
We prefer a broad, diverse and open conceptualization - including political
consciousness, and ecological consciousness (for example in the sense of
Bateson's ``ecology of mind''), but we do not wish to define for our authors
exactly what any of these terms mean. We seek to provoke a spirited debate
by actively seeking serious opposing views, for example from cognitive
science, biology and philosophy.
The Journal of Consciousness Studies covers this broad field
by:
- Presenting serious peer-reviewed scientific
and humanistic papers
in non-technical language:
 |
The brain and its "agent"
debate the provenance of
thoughts in the charming
language of an old
Readers Digest article.
Illustration: Jack Buckmaster
Full text
|
- Including philosophical critiques of contemporary
research:
 |
Contributors include:
Daniel Dennett
Owen Flanagan
John McCarthy
Jaron Lanier
Mary Midgley
Charles T. Tart
Todd C. Moody
Illustration: Paul Caro
with thanks to the Times Higher
|
- Considering submissions from all disciplines
and viewpoints:
 |
Dipankar Home &
Andrew Robinson:
|
- Encouraging a robust and lively debate on
the full range of issues involved:
Rick Grush and Patricia
Churchland described the Penrose-Hameroff theory of quantum coherence
in microtubules as "no better supported than any one of a gazillion
caterpillar-with-hookah hypotheses", to which Penrose
and Hameroff reply:
- It's not that we're in Wonderland
But p'raps their heads are in the sand

Illustration: Jack Buckmaster (with apologies to John Tenniel)
Critical Reviews
The complete text from which these
are extracted is available.
- Do we need this journal? . . . Yes, we do: there is no other journal
quite like it, and one day we shall, I think, look back to its appearance
as a defining moment . . . and at the price, it's a snip!
Jeffrey Gray, Nature
- With JCS, consciousness studies has arrived.
Susan Greefield, Times
Higher Education Supplement
- There is a need for a journal that will publish high-quality work on
consciousness while being at the same time less tied down by rigid views
as to the suitability of material than most journals. One hopes that the
promise of this first issue will be fulfilled.
Brian Josephson, Times Higher Education
Supplement.
- It is pleasant that we are promised discussions in the humanities as
well as in science, with papers on culture and on the philosophy of mind
slated for future issues. It will continue to have something for everybody.
David Chalmers, Times Literary Supplement.
- A volatile mixture of refereed articles, interviews and conference
reports from all camps (reductionist to mystical) in one of the most exciting
areas of research and theory-making.
Gene Feder, The Lancet.
- Its advisory board is a roll-call of the biggest names in consciousness
publishing.
John Cornwell, The Tablet.
- You guys have a marvelous magazine. You publish a lot of things that
would not be published in routine philosophical and scientific journals,
and that seems to me exactly right at our present state of the investigation
of consciousness. We don't know how it works and we need to try all kinds
of different ideas.
John Searle (recorded interview with
Anthony Freeman).
Full Text of Selected Articles
JCS is a traditional printed publication -- most of our subscribers
like to read every article and we pride ourselves in the quality of our
editing, printing and binding. Besides, at only $45 for six issues, "at
the price, it's a snip!" (review in Nature
magazine). However we have a thriving email discussion group, jcs-online
which is archived here and have included
the full text of a representative sample of refereed articles from JCS
itself:
- David J. Chalmers, Facing up to the problem
of consciousness (Volume 2, No.3)
- Daniel C. Dennett, Facing backwards
on the problem of consciousness (Volume 3, No.1)
- Andy Clark, I am John's Brain
(Volume 2, No.2)
- Todd C. Moody, Conversations with zombies
(Volume 1, No.2)
- Jaron Lanier, You
can't argue with a zombie (Volume 2, No.4)
- Stuart Hameroff and Roger Penrose, Conscious
events as orchestrated spacetime selections (Volume 3, No. 1)
- Bernard J. Baars, Understanding subjectivity:
Global Workspace theory and the resurrection of the observing self
(Volume 3, No.3)
- Arthur Deikman, "I" = awareness
(Volume 3, No.4)
- Thomas Metzinger, Faster than thought:
holism, homogeneity and temporal coding (from Conscious
Experience)
- Robert Forman, What does mysticism have to teach
us about consciousness (from Tucson conference)
For free printed offprints of other articles, email sandra@imprint.co.uk
Home
Page
Top
of Page